| Stage No: | 1 | |||||||||||
| Place | Name | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||
| 1 | Halt, Ray | Tactical | 89 | 0 | 21.78 | 4.0863 | 90.0000 | 100.00% | ||||
| 2 | Mioduszewski, Mike | Tactical | 74 | 20 | 19.23 | 2.8081 | 61.8479 | 68.72% | ||||
| 3 | Lang, Melanie | Tactical | 89 | 0 | 36.61 | 2.4310 | 53.5423 | 59.49% | ||||
| 4 | Lang, Melanie | Tactical | 89 | 0 | 40.17 | 2.2156 | 48.7982 | 54.22% | ||||
| 5 | Cass, Cindy | Tactical | 85 | 0 | 45.24 | 1.8789 | 41.3824 | 45.98% | ||||
| 6 | Cass, Cindy | Tactical | 84 | 10 | 51.99 | 1.4234 | 31.3501 | 34.83% | ||||
| Stage No: | 2 | |||||||||||
| Place | Name | Division | Points | Penalties | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % | ||||
| 1 | Halt, Ray | Tactical | 59 | 0 | 15.10 | 3.9073 | 60.0000 | 100.00% | ||||
| 2 | Mioduszewski, Mike | Tactical | 52 | 10 | 11.21 | 3.7467 | 57.5338 | 95.89% | ||||
| 3 | Cass, Cindy | Tactical | 58 | 0 | 20.88 | 2.7778 | 42.6555 | 71.09% | ||||
| 4 | Lang, Melanie | Tactical | 55 | 0 | 20.34 | 2.7040 | 41.5223 | 69.20% | ||||
| 5 | Lang, Melanie | Tactical | 58 | 0 | 22.91 | 2.5316 | 38.8749 | 64.79% | ||||
| 6 | Cass, Cindy | Tactical | 56 | 0 | 23.29 | 2.4045 | 36.9232 | 61.54% | ||||
| Back | ||||||||||||