|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stage Results - Limited Optics | |||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Div | PF | Points | Pen | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Konopa, Kyle | M | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 11.94 | 5.8626 | 80.0000 | 100.00% | |
| 2 | Chen, Shi | A | LO | Min | 74 | 0 | 13.20 | 5.6061 | 76.4998 | 95.62% | |
| 3 | Wang, Roy | U | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 12.68 | 5.5205 | 75.3318 | 94.16% | |
| 4 | Chen, Shi | B | LO | Min | 69 | 10 | 12.28 | 4.8046 | 65.5627 | 81.95% | |
| 5 | Michali, Denny | A | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 14.67 | 4.7716 | 65.1124 | 81.39% | |
| 6 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 14.77 | 4.7393 | 64.6716 | 80.84% | |
| 7 | Johnson, Matthew | B | LO | Min | 60 | 0 | 12.68 | 4.7319 | 64.5707 | 80.71% | |
| 8 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 14.68 | 4.6322 | 63.2102 | 79.01% | |
| 9 | Willesch, Bob | U | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 15.36 | 4.5573 | 62.1881 | 77.74% | |
| 10 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 15.13 | 4.4944 | 61.3298 | 76.66% | |
| 11 | Zambrzycki, Ryan | A | LO | Min | 63 | 10 | 11.98 | 4.4240 | 60.3691 | 75.46% | |
| 12 | Johnson, Jim | U | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 15.58 | 4.3646 | 59.5586 | 74.45% | |
| 13 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 15.59 | 4.3618 | 59.5203 | 74.40% | |
| 14 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 70 | 0 | 17.18 | 4.0745 | 55.5999 | 69.50% | |
| 15 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 17.02 | 3.9953 | 54.5192 | 68.15% | |
| 16 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 18.00 | 3.7778 | 51.5512 | 64.44% | |
| 17 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 78 | 0 | 21.03 | 3.7090 | 50.6124 | 63.27% | |
| 18 | Duk, Tom | C | LO | Min | 74 | 0 | 20.02 | 3.6963 | 50.4391 | 63.05% | |
| 19 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 78 | 0 | 21.32 | 3.6585 | 49.9232 | 62.40% | |
| 20 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 74 | 0 | 20.50 | 3.6098 | 49.2587 | 61.57% | |
| 21 | Duk, Tom | C | LO | Min | 78 | 0 | 22.46 | 3.4728 | 47.3892 | 59.24% | |
| 22 | Manzel, John | C | LO | Min | 78 | 0 | 23.25 | 3.3548 | 45.7790 | 57.22% | |
| 23 | Manzel, John | C | LO | Min | 78 | 0 | 23.66 | 3.2967 | 44.9862 | 56.23% | |
| 24 | Peibek, David | C | LO | Min | 74 | 0 | 23.23 | 3.1855 | 43.4688 | 54.34% | |
| 25 | Peibek, David | C | LO | Min | 64 | 0 | 20.18 | 3.1715 | 43.2777 | 54.10% | |
| 26 | Longberg, Brian | U | LO | Min | 52 | 0 | 17.08 | 3.0445 | 41.5447 | 51.93% | |
| 27 | Hensel, Donn | U | LO | Min | 74 | 0 | 24.36 | 3.0378 | 41.4533 | 51.82% | |
| 28 | Skoczlas, Dan | B | LO | Min | 68 | 0 | 22.81 | 2.9811 | 40.6796 | 50.85% | |
| 29 | Skoczlas, Dan | B | LO | Min | 57 | 10 | 22.10 | 2.1267 | 29.0206 | 36.28% | |
| 30 | Donikowski, Jeff | LO | Min | 62 | 0 | 34.13 | 1.8166 | 24.7890 | 30.99% | ||
| Stage Results - Limited Optics | |||||||||||
| Place | Name | No. | Class | Div | PF | Points | Pen | Time | Hit Factor | Stage Pts | Stage % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Konopa, Kyle | M | LO | Min | 122 | 0 | 16.17 | 7.5448 | 140.0000 | 100.00% | |
| 2 | Zambrzycki, Ryan | A | LO | Min | 134 | 0 | 17.95 | 7.4652 | 138.5230 | 98.94% | |
| 3 | Chen, Shi | B | LO | Min | 128 | 0 | 17.99 | 7.1151 | 132.0266 | 94.30% | |
| 4 | Johnson, Matthew | B | LO | Min | 123 | 10 | 16.57 | 6.8196 | 126.5433 | 90.39% | |
| 5 | Wang, Roy | U | LO | Min | 123 | 10 | 16.73 | 6.7543 | 125.3316 | 89.52% | |
| 6 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 116 | 0 | 19.46 | 5.9609 | 110.6094 | 79.01% | |
| 7 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 110 | 0 | 18.87 | 5.8294 | 108.1693 | 77.26% | |
| 8 | Chen, Shi | A | LO | Min | 120 | 20 | 17.87 | 5.5960 | 103.8384 | 74.17% | |
| 9 | Michali, Denny | A | LO | Min | 116 | 0 | 21.24 | 5.4614 | 101.3408 | 72.39% | |
| 10 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 128 | 0 | 24.22 | 5.2849 | 98.0657 | 70.05% | |
| 11 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 110 | 20 | 17.28 | 5.2083 | 96.6443 | 69.03% | |
| 12 | Willesch, Bob | U | LO | Min | 115 | 10 | 20.18 | 5.2032 | 96.5497 | 68.96% | |
| 13 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 130 | 0 | 26.98 | 4.8184 | 89.4094 | 63.86% | |
| 14 | Johnson, Jim | U | LO | Min | 102 | 20 | 18.07 | 4.5379 | 84.2045 | 60.15% | |
| 15 | Manzel, John | C | LO | Min | 136 | 0 | 31.45 | 4.3243 | 80.2410 | 57.31% | |
| 16 | Tanruther, Steve | C | LO | Min | 106 | 20 | 20.89 | 4.1168 | 76.3906 | 54.56% | |
| 17 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 128 | 0 | 31.16 | 4.1078 | 76.2236 | 54.45% | |
| 18 | Sanner, Nathan | U | LO | Min | 126 | 0 | 30.69 | 4.1056 | 76.1828 | 54.42% | |
| 19 | Manzel, John | C | LO | Min | 136 | 0 | 33.94 | 4.0071 | 74.3551 | 53.11% | |
| 20 | Skoczlas, Dan | B | LO | Min | 124 | 0 | 31.23 | 3.9705 | 73.6759 | 52.63% | |
| 21 | Hensel, Donn | U | LO | Min | 113 | 10 | 26.91 | 3.8276 | 71.0243 | 50.73% | |
| 22 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 134 | 0 | 35.40 | 3.7853 | 70.2394 | 50.17% | |
| 23 | Longberg, Brian | U | LO | Min | 113 | 10 | 27.73 | 3.7144 | 68.9238 | 49.23% | |
| 24 | Peibek, David | C | LO | Min | 116 | 0 | 32.07 | 3.6171 | 67.1183 | 47.94% | |
| 25 | Duk, Tom | C | LO | Min | 117 | 10 | 29.95 | 3.5726 | 66.2925 | 47.35% | |
| 26 | Macy, Jim | U | LO | Min | 128 | 0 | 35.98 | 3.5575 | 66.0124 | 47.15% | |
| 27 | Peibek, David | C | LO | Min | 123 | 10 | 33.92 | 3.3314 | 61.8169 | 44.15% | |
| 28 | Duk, Tom | C | LO | Min | 124 | 20 | 34.86 | 2.9834 | 55.3595 | 39.54% | |
| 29 | Skoczlas, Dan | B | LO | Min | 109 | 30 | 30.38 | 2.6004 | 48.2526 | 34.47% | |
| 30 | Donikowski, Jeff | LO | Min | 115 | 20 | 53.82 | 1.7651 | 32.7529 | 23.39% | ||
| Back | |||||||||||